The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
(RYGBP) is the most commonly performed WLS
in the world today. This operation has a
long track record of success in the
management of morbid obesity around the
world and in the United States. The results
of this procedure are the standards by which
all other procedures are compared. Before
1995, the majority of these procedures were
performed through a large abdominal
incision. Currently, the laparoscopic
approach has become more prevalent as a
result of patients’ demand for lesser
invasive procedures and advances in surgical
techniques. Much like the Lap Band®
procedure, the gastric bypass is designed to
limit meal intake by creating a sensation of
fullness with smaller food volumes. In
addition, the majority of the stomach and
several feet of small intestine are bypassed
and no longer come in contact with ingested
food. This combination of restricted caloric
intake and a moderate malabsorptive
component give rise to a hybrid procedure
that has profound beneficial effects.
A key feature of this operation not seen in
with the Lap Band® or duodenal switch
procedures is appetite suppression. Hunger
and food cravings are virtually eliminated
for up to 6 months after surgery in most
patients. Weight loss is fairly dramatic for
the first year and tapers off over the
following 6 months. By 18 months, a weight
loss plateau at a level above ideal body
weight and an average 65 to 70% of excess
body weight (EBW) is lost.
Even more dramatic than weight loss, type 2
diabetes, characterized by insulin
resistance and the ever-increasing need for
greater doses of insulin injections is
either cured or dramatically improved in 86%
of diabetic patients. This radical reversal
of diabetes often occurs within one month of
the operation, long before significant
weight loss has occurred.
The mechanism by which the
RYGBP works is complex. After surgery,
patients often experience marked changes in
their behavior. Most patients have a
reduction in hunger and feel full sooner
after eating. Patients often state that they
enjoy healthy foods and lose many of their
improper food cravings. Rarely do people
feel deprived of food. These complex
behavioral changes are partially due to
alterations in several hormones (ghrelin,
GIP, GLP, PYY) and neural signals produced
in the GI tract that communicate with the
hunger centers in the brain. Another
mechanism for weight loss after the RYGBP is
referred to as the dumping syndrome. Dumping
may result in lightheadedness, flushing,
heart palpitations, diarrhea and other
symptoms early (within 10 to 30 minutes)
after eating sweets or foods with a high
concentration of sugar. Some people remain
extremely sensitive to sweets for the rest
of their lives; most patients lose some or
all of their sweets sensitivity over time.
Clinical studies have demonstrated that
laparoscopic RYGBP is a safe and effective
alternative to open RYGBP for the treatment
of morbid obesity. Dr. Higa and colleagues
reported the largest laparoscopic RYGBP
experience with 1,500 operations. There have
been three prospective, randomized trials
comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic vs.
open RYGBP. Nguyen and colleagues reported
the largest trial in 2001. In 2004, a group
from Murcia, Spain published their results.
Long-term weight loss after laparoscopic and
open RYGBP should not differ, as the primary
differences between the two techniques is
largely in the method of access and not the
gastrointestinal reconstruction.
Despite the advantages of the laparoscopic
approach, open bariatric surgery still plays
a prominent role in management of morbidly
obese patients. Relative contraindications
for laparoscopic bariatric surgery include
patients with extremely high body mass
index, patients with multiple previous upper
abdominal surgeries, and patients with prior
bariatric surgery. Another limitation of the
laparoscopic approach is the steep learning
curve of this technically challenging
procedure for the surgeon, so it is not an
operation for the surgeon who has not been
trained specifically in this technique.
As important as it is for patients to
understand the gravity of weight loss
surgery, the overall benefits must also be
carefully evaluated. Those of us in the
field of bariatric surgery observe the
incredible life changing events which occur
routinely in our patients. It is extremely
gratifying to be able to provide surgical
therapy, which so greatly impacts our
patients in such a positive way. It is truly
an honorable and rewarding profession.
While this personal reflection may appear
romanticized, there is clearly an emerging
volume of credible scientific evidence that
weight loss surgery is not only effective in
producing lasting weight loss, but also
significantly reducing obesity-related
illness. When one evaluates the alternatives
to surgery in the morbidly obese population,
there is no comparison.
Bearing in mind that the morbidly obese
population is by definition at high risk for
serious, life-threatening diseases, any
therapy that creates significant weight loss
must also diminish associated comorbidities.
Such benefits have been repeatedly
documented in several thorough clinical
investigations.
In the year 2000, an interesting study was
published in the Annuls of Surgery depicting
extremely high cure rates for associated
comorbidities in the morbidly obese who
underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass1. The
results illustrated in the table below are a
list of the diseases commonly associated
with patients who are morbidly obese.
Comorbidity
% Improved
% Resolved
% Cured or
Improved
Diabetes
18
82
100
Cholesterol
33
63
99
GERD
24
72
99
Sleep Apnea
19
74
93
Joint Pain
47
41
88
Depression
47
8
55
Hypertension
12
18
30
Adapted
from Ann Surg. 2000 October; 232(4):
515–529.
This and other retrospective
studies demonstrate high cure rates for
obesity-related illnesses and although not
all reports established such significant
positive changes, most of the published
literature of the past 20 years confirms
with the dramatic improvement in
obesity-related diseases after Roux-en-Y
gastric bypass.
Dr. Christou
and his team from McGill University in
Montreal, Canada compared their results of
outcomes in thousands of patients who either
underwent weight loss surgery or diet
therapy without surgery2. After five years,
the surgery patients enjoyed an 89%
decreased risk of dying over the group
treated with diet therapy only. Not only did
they also reduce their overall health care
costs by 50%, they also benefited from a
400% reduction in cancer incidence and 50%
reduction in hospitalizations.
Dr. Buchwald published the most convincing
evidence touting the overall safety and
efficacy of weight loss surgery in 2004 in
the Journal of the American Medical
Association3. In this article, the outcomes
of over 22,000 patients who underwent weight
loss surgery in the United States in highly
reputable medical facilities were
investigated. Careful analysis of the
results demonstrated low complications and
death rates in addition to dramatic and
lasting weight loss and most importantly,
the resolution of comorbidities. Dr.
Buchwald’s paper highlights the phenomenally
high cure rates for diabetes, hypertension,
sleep apnea, and hyperlipidemia. The results
of this careful study illustrate what most
of us who manage patients after weight loss
surgery already know; bariatric surgery
produces reliable and sustained weight loss
along with striking resolution of most
obesity-related diseases
1. Schauer P R
et al. Ann Surg. 2000 October; 232(4):
515–529.
2, Christou NV; MacLean LD
McGill,. Adv Surg. 2005; 39:165-79
3. Buchwald et al. JAMA Oct
2004; 292(14); 1724-37.
The gold standard in bariatric surgery in
the 21st century is still the RYGBP.
Undoubtedly the most studied and time-tested
procedure in the last 50 years, the RYGBP is
the most reliable weight loss operation
currently available. The restrictive nature
of the operation is combined with an
additional feature lacking in the Lap Band®
procedure or the outdated vertical banded
gastroplasty (VBG). Cessation of huger and
food cravings is a distinct advantage of the
RYGBP over other operations. Two features of
this operation contribute to this beneficial
effect, separation of the gastric pouch from
the remaining stomach and diversion of food
away from the duodenum.
Creating a separate gastric pouch surgically
disconnects neural pathways from the brain
to portions of the stomach, thereby
minimizing the conscious awareness of
hunger. These nerve fibers slowly regenerate
over a 6 to 8 month period, so the effect
does subside over time.
By creating a bypass of the gastric pouch to
the small intestine, the undigested meal is
never allowed to contact the lining of the
remaining stomach and duodenum. For reasons
not fully understood, this diversion of
undigested food away from the duodenum
creates a dramatic reversal of insulin
resistance, the primary feature of type II
diabetes. A degree of malabsorption is also
provided by this step that limits, to a
degree, the amount of small intestine
allowed to come in contact with and absorb
nutrients.
While the length of the bypassed segment of
stomach and intestine remain constant, the
length of the Roux limb varies based on the
BMI of the patient. In patients whose BMI is
< 50, the length of the Roux limb will be
maintained at 100cm or about 3 feet. For
patients whose BMI is > 50, the Roux limb
will be extended to a length of 150cm or 4.5
feet. Adding length to the Roux limb
actually decreases the length of the small
intestine allowed to absorb nutrients,
thereby increasing the malabsorptive
component of this procedure. A greater
degree of malabsorption is added to patients
whose BMI is >50 (“super morbid obesity”)
because it leads to greater weight loss.
Longer Roux limb leads to
greater weight loss.
Long-term studies of weight
loss with RYGBP concur with a significant
drop in weight for the initial 6 months
after surgery. From this point, weight loss
tapers off slowly over the next 6 to 12
months. At 18 to 24 months after RYGBP,
weight loss plateaus and in approximately
10% of people, weight gain may occur. This
is the direct result of unhealthy eating
habits that creep back such as increasing
starches, fats and ‘soft’ foods such as
potatoes, pastas, and rice.
The above graph describes the
weight loss in open gastric bypass patients
(OGBP) to laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP).
The weight loss curves are nearly identical.
Note that after 18 months, the weight loss
stabilizes. Open gastric bypass patients
tend to have larger BMIs whereas LGBP
patients tent to have lower BMIs. This graph
demonstrates that there is no difference in
weight loss after RYGBP whether the
procedure is performed as an open procedure
or via laparoscopic techniques.
In this study, the graph
above suggests slight weight loss after 18
months, however there appears to be modest
weight gain between months 24 to 30. Note
the similarity in the weight loss curve to
the prior study.
• The average excess weight loss after the
Roux-en-Y procedure is generally higher in a
compliant patient than with purely
restrictive procedures (Lap Band®
procedure).
• One year after surgery, weight loss can
average 77% of excess body weight.
• Studies show that after 10 to 14 years,
some patients have maintained 50-60% of
excess body weight loss.
• A 2000 study of 500 patients showed that
96% of certain associated health conditions
studied (back pain, sleep apnea, high blood
pressure, diabetes and depression) were
improved or resolved.
• Because the duodenum is bypassed, poor
absorption of iron and calcium can result in
the lowering of total body iron and a
predisposition to iron deficiency anemia.
This is a particular concern for patients
who experience chronic blood loss during
excessive menstrual flow or bleeding
hemorrhoids. Women, already at risk for
osteoporosis that can occur after menopause,
should be aware of the potential for
heightened bone calcium loss.
• Bypassing the duodenum has caused
metabolic bone disease in some patients,
resulting in bone pain, loss of height,
humped back and fractures of the ribs and
hipbones. All of the deficiencies mentioned
above, however, can be managed through
proper diet and vitamin supplements.
• A chronic anemia due to Vitamin B12
deficiency may occur. The problem can
usually be managed with Vitamin B12 pills or
injections.
• A condition known as "dumping syndrome"
can occur as the result of rapid emptying of
stomach contents into the small intestine.
This is sometimes triggered when too much
sugar or large amounts of food are consumed.
While generally not considered to be a
serious risk to your health, the results can
be extremely unpleasant and can include
nausea, weakness, sweating, faintness and,
on occasion, diarrhea after eating. Some
patients are unable to eat any form of
sweets after surgery. Dumping is considered
by many to be an advantage because it helps
avoid unhealthy eating.
• In some cases, the effectiveness of the
procedure may be reduced if the stomach
pouch is stretched and/or if it is initially
left larger than 15-30cc.
• The bypassed portion of the stomach,
duodenum and segments of the small intestine
cannot be easily visualized using X-ray or
endoscopy if problems such as ulcers,
bleeding or malignancy should occur.
As with any surgery, there are immediate and
long-term complications and risks. Two
complications pose the greatest risk after
RYGBP surgery, staple line leak and
pulmonary embolism (blood clot to the lung).
Remember, these two complications usually
occur within the first 2 to 3 weeks after
surgery, so it is unlikely to develop either
of these complications after 1 to 2 months
after surgery.
If staple line leak and pulmonary embolism
are suspected, X-ray studies such as CT
scans and fluoroscopic exams are used to
confirm both complications. Even the most
up-to-date CT scanners, however, have weight
limits up to 450 lbs. Both CT scanners and
fluoroscopy tables at Baptist hospital have
450 lb. weight limits. This means that if
you weight more than 450 lbs., you must
understand that should your physician
suspect a staple line leak or a pulmonary
embolism after surgery, there is no
radiological method available to confirm or
rule out your diagnosis. In these cases
and in others, your physician will likely
treat your condition empirically, that is
without actually confirming the diagnosis,
as both these conditions can be lethal if
left untreated. The treatment for a staple
line leak could include emergent
re-exploration in the operating room to
close the leak and drain the area. Pulmonary
emboli are managed by administering blood
thinning medications as Heparin® or Warfarin
that inhibit further clotting. I will speak
with you further about the benefits and
risks if you wish. Possible risks can
include, but are not limited to:
Leaks from staple lines
Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
(blood clot to lung)
Bleeding*
Complications due to anesthesia and
medications
Infections
Stricture
Marginal ulcers
Bowel obstruction
Nutrient deficiency
Death
* To control operative bleeding, removal of
the spleen may be necessary.
Staple line leaks can occur wherever
the GI tract is joined together either at
the gastric pouch connection or the small
bowel connection. Normally, if a leak
occurs, it is within 3 to 5 days after
surgery. Most leaks occur after the patient
has already begun ingesting liquids in the
hospital or at home.
Leaks are prevented at
surgery by assuring proper visualization,
firing and maintenance of stapling devices.
All pouches are routinely checked for leak
before the operation is terminated by
injecting the pouch with methylene blue dye
and inspecting the staple line for dye
leakage. After the dye test, air is injected
into the pouch as it placed under water to
inspect for air bubbles at the staple line.
If a leak is identified by either test, it
is promptly repaired with suture and both
tests are repeated until there is no
evidence of leak. The operation is not
complete until the pouch is assured to be
both air and watertight.
After 4 to 5 days from surgery, the healing
processes have replaced the staple lines by
laying down scar and healing tissue. Once
this healing process is complete, there is
virtually no risk of a leak. Any process
that inhibits the healing process,
therefore, increases the potential for a
leak.
Nicotine and other tobacco products as well
as chronic steroid use promote poor wound
healing. Both of these conditions are
contraindications for weight loss surgery
and will eliminate patients as candidates
for surgery. Patients must abstain from
ingesting or smoking tobacco for 30 days
before surgery. Lab samples are tested
before surgery to check compliance.
If these signs occur in the hospital, the
patient will be taken immediately to the
Radiology Department to undergo testing. An
upper GI will often demonstrate the leak
quickly and allow rapid treatment that may
require laparoscopic or open surgery to
repair the leak and add drains. A CT scan of
the chest may be ordered to rule out a blood
clot to the lung as many symptoms overlap.
Sometimes the leak may not develop until
later in the course of recovery. If the leak
appears to be contained, that is, it is not
flowing freely into the abdomen, then simple
drainage of the fluid collection may be all
that is necessary. A leak can be disastrous
if it remains unrecognized or untreated. It
is vitally important that patients seek out
“Centers of Excellence” for their surgery,
as these hospitals and surgeons are prepared
for and equipped to manage all situations 24
hours a day.
Pulmonary Embolism or
blood clot that travels to the lung is
extremely rare occurring <1% of cases. These
are blood clots that form in the deep veins
of the calves during or immediately after
surgery. They can occur after any form of
surgery, after prolonged sitting or in women
who are on hormone therapy. When the blood
clots form in the vein of the leg, they may
adhere to the wall of the vein or they may
dislodge. A dislodged blood clot will travel
with the blood flow back to the heart. The
heart then pumps returning venous blood to
the lungs where the clot will become lodged.
A large clot will essentially diminish the
lungs capacity to oxygenate blood and within
2 to 3 minutes patients can succumb.
Pulmonary blood clots are serious but rare.
It is impossible to predict which patients
are at risk, therefore all patients are
treated as if they are at risk.
Prior to surgery, patients will receive a
form of Heparin® in the holding area to thin
the blood and make it less prone to clot. In
addition, compression hose and pneumatic
pumps are applied prior to the start of the
procedure. Blood thinner therapy and the
calf compression therapy will be continued
throughout the hospital course and early
ambulation will begin on the night of
surgery. Patients are encouraged to walk
four times a day in the hospital and at
home. Walking promotes blood flow in the
legs and decreases the risk of clot
formation.
Pulmonary emboli are suspected when a
patient becomes short of breath and the
blood oxygen level drops suddenly. A CT scan
of the chest may confirm or rule out the
possibility of a blood clot in the major
vein feeding the lungs. The treatment is
immediate transfer to an ICU, respiratory
support if needed and intravenous high-dose
blood thinner to prevent further clots and
initiate clot retraction. The weight limit
for the CT scanner at Baptist Hospital is
450 lbs. Patients who weight more than 450
lbs will be too heavy for the limits of the
scanner. Patients who weigh more than 450
lbs must understand prior to surgery that
their physicians may be at a disadvantage
because of this limitation. In these
circumstances, patients are treated
empirically; meaning therapy may be
instituted without benefit of confirming
tests.
Bleeding is a risk of any
intraabdominal surgery. The risk of bleeding
after RYGBP is approximately 3%. Most
bleeding stops spontaneously avoiding the
need for transfusion or return to the
operating room. Occasionally, blood
transfusions may be required, however this
is unlikely. Bleeding can occur at the
various staple lines or form blood vessles
inside the abdomen.
Complications due to anesthesia and
medications are generally caused by
reactions to the anesthetic agents.
Drowsiness, nausea and sore throat are
common effects from the anesthetic event.
The induction of general anesthesia may
precipitate heart and airway problems that
already exist. Morbidly obese patients can
have undiagnosed heart disease or sleep
apnea that manifests during or after the
procedure. Often these patients require
overnight ICU observation and may remain on
the ventilator for additional hours or days
until it is safe to allow them to breathe on
their own.
Infections in laparoscopic incisions
are rare and inconsequential. Wound
infections in the obese patient with open
surgery, however can be a serious issue
unless treated aggressively. All patients
receive intravenous antibiotics before and
after surgery to decrease the incidence of
infections. Infections on the inside of the
abdomen are much more serious. An abscess
may require operative intervention and
prolonged hospital stay. Most Intraabdominal
infections are due to contamination of the
peritoneal cavity from gut bacteria.
Strictures are areas of scarring that
occur at the junction of the gastric pouch
to the small intestine. Strictures occur 4
to 8 weeks after surgery and are the result
of contracture of scar tissue that forms at
the staple line in 7-10%. It is desirable to
have a modicum of narrowing at this location
to maintain satiety after meals. However, if
the opening admits less than the diameter of
a pencil, solids will be regurgitated and
liquids may be the only means of intake.
Fortunately, strictures are easily managed
by endoscopic dilation with a soft balloon.
Often a single dilatation is all that is
required.
Stricture at pouch opening.
Marginal ulcers are
ulcerations that occur just below the pouch
to small intestine junction. They cause
pain, nausea, and may lead to a stricture if
the ulcer is chronic. Smokers are at highest
risk for the development of marginal ulcers
which can occur in about 4% of cases. Many
studies document the leading cause of
ulceration in those who begin smoking after
their bypass. These ulcers may be difficult
to treat even with routine anti-ulcer
medications. Ulcers can erode into
underlying blood vessels and cause GI tract
bleeding that may require surgical
correction. Prevention is the best medicine.
Gastric bypass patients should avoid certain
medications that can cause ulcers as
Ibuprofen (Advil®), Nuprin® or Naprosyn®.
Bowel obstruction after weight loss
surgery may be from several different
sources. Although it arises in 2.5% of
cases, the most common cause of bowel
obstruction is from internal hernias where a
portion of the small intestine can twist and
wrap around or through a space created by
the new surgical anatomy. These potential
spaces are closed at the time of surgery,
however with laparoscopic surgery,
intraabdominal scarring is sparse leaving
the small intestine more mobile. Even small
openings between layers of tissue may allow
enough room for the bowel to worm its way
and create obstruction. The diagnosis of an
internal hernia may be difficult as internal
hernias may be intermittent and undetectable
on CT scanning. The treatment is
laparoscopic exploration and closure of the
defect with permanent suture.
Internal hernia after RYGBP.
CT scan of internal hernia, trapped bowel in
white.
Nutrient deficiency is
the Achilles heel of the RYGBP. It has been
estimated that up to 30% of patients may be
iron or calcium deficient after RYGBP.
Patients who are considering this operation
must understand they are mandated to take
supplemental vitamins, calcium and iron
every day for life. The duodenum is the
portion of the small intestine where
calcium, iron and B12 are preferentially
absorbed. Because the duodenum is no longer
in the stream of food flow, RYGBP patients
become susceptible to vitamin and nutrient
deficiencies that lead to anemia,
osteoporosis and lethargy. Hence, routine
blood work is required on an annual basis to
assess vitamin and nutrient levels.
Long-term follow up is mandatory as most
patients become less compliant with
medications after surgery; as their co
morbid conditions diminish, they become
accustomed to taking fewer and fewer
medications.
Nutrient absorption.
The specific types of
nutrients and their doses must also be
noted. Calcium citrate is recommended rather
than other forms of calcium because of
better absorption. Iron absorption is
improved when taken with citric acid (orange
juice) and diminished when taken with
calcium so the two pills must be taken at
different times of the day. Vitamin B12 is
poorly absorbed in RYGBP patients requiring
either oral dissolvable tablets or monthly
injections. Folate and Vitamin D levels need
attention as well. The long-term effects of
iron and calcium deficiencies are insidious
and debilitating if left untreated.
Protein intake is stressed to all surgical
weight loss patients regardless of their
procedure. RYGBP patients tend to loose
weight rapidly and can loose muscle mass in
great proportions. Protein ingestion and
exercise will minimize muscle wasting and
hair loss that normally arises 6 to 8 after
surgery. This leads to the recommendation of
60 to 80 grams of daily protein ingestion.
Most dieticians recommend RYGBP patients
fill up on the protein in their meals first
to assure adequate intake.
Death after RYGBP was the subject of
serious study in a meta-analysis published
in JAMA (Journal of the American Medical
Association) in 2004. This analysis compared
outcomes in over 22,000 patients who
underwent weight loss surgery in reputable
American university affiliated programs. The
RYGBP mortality was 0.5% compared to Lap
Band® at 0.1% and duodenal switch at 1.1%.
According to the American Society for
Bariatric Surgery 2004 Consensus Statement,
the operative mortality (death) associated
with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the hands
of a skilled surgeon is roughly 0.5 percent.
2003 MEDICARE
MORTALITY RATES
Weight Loss
Surgery
0.8%
Hip
Replacement
2.0%
Coronary
Artery Bypass
3.0%
Relative mortality rates for
other commonly performed operations in the
United States may help shed some perspective
on the issue of operative mortality.
After RYGBP, the newly created gastric pouch
is smaller than a chicken egg. The walls of
the pouch are swollen from the manipulation
of surgery and its capacity is severely
limited for the first 2 weeks after surgery.
Liquids are all that are acceptable for the
first 1 to 2 weeks after surgery. It may be
all you can do to ingest water. We recommend
non-carbonated, low calorie liquids only for
the first 2 weeks. Liquids are the most
important priority. Because you are no
longer able to chug, it is important to
carry a jug or measured container with you
all the time. This ensures your ability to
take in at least 32 oz. of water a day.
After 2 weeks, the pouch walls are stiff and
inelastic. Patients often begin noticing odd
sensations and nauseating smells. Some
patients will be unable to tolerate perfumes
or sweet odors. They may notice that odors
that were once pleasant become nauseating or
intolerable. This changes over time,
however, it can be quite upsetting
initially. It may greatly affect how and
what you eat. A simple odor may create an
unexpected avoidance of that particular food
forever. Over time, your pouch will soften
and begin to comply with the meal. It will
then be possible to actually begin meals
with more consistency.
Recommended Diet Schedule After Gastric
Bypass
Weeks 1 and 2 Liquids - non-carbonated, low
calorie
Weeks 3 to 6 Puréed foods – use a blender
Week 7 Soft foods
Week 8 ‘Regular’ diet – small portions,
chew, chew, chew.
From the 3rd to the 6th week after surgery,
pureed foods are recommended. A pureed diet
requires a blender. Puréed food has the
consistency of a thick liquid, so if you
desire spaghetti, put it in the blender and
give it a try. If you cheat, you may see
your meal again. This is also the time to
begin learning about the protein content of
specific food items. Our goal is to
eventually increase the protein to a daily
intake of at least 80 grams. 80 grams of
protein a day is likely more protein than
most people are used to eating. Liquid
protein drinks and powders that can be mixed
in a liquid are often an acceptable way to
achieve daily protein requirements.
At 2 weeks, you will start taking your
multivitamin and Pepcid®. After 4 weeks, you
should begin taking your iron and calcium.
Remember to take the calcium citrate at
different times as the iron. (Calcium
diminishes iron absorption.)
After 6 weeks, soft foods are on the menu
for week 7. Start off with gentle items like
mashed potatoes, yogurt, grits, oatmeal, or
well-cooked pastas. Once you have mastered
these, or at least figured out what will
work for you, then at about the 8th week,
you are ready for real food. Avoid steak,
hamburger, pork and highly spicy foods at
first. Chew your foods carefully and slow
down your pace around mealtime.